For builders who shipped with AI

Cursor, Lovable, Replit, Bolt or Claude built it fast.
Now you need to know what it actually did.

A fixed-price audit that reads your AI-generated codebase and tells you exactly what's broken, exposed, or one bad request away from failing — before your users find out for you.

Get the $199 audit See what's included →

Written report in 3 business days. No subscription, no retainer.

This is probably you if —

It worked in the demo. Then you asked the AI to change one thing, and two other things quietly broke.
You have no idea if your API keys, DB credentials, or Stripe secret key are sitting in the repo somewhere.
You're about to let real users sign up, or take real payments, and nobody has read the whole codebase — the AI wrote all of it.
Every prompt you send to fix a bug makes you less sure the previous fixes are still standing.
You don't need a full rebuild. You need someone to tell you, specifically, what's actually wrong.

What gets checked

Every audit runs the same seven-point pass over your repo. Not a linter run — a person reading the code your AI tool wrote.

Secrets & credentials

Hardcoded API keys, tokens, or DB passwords in the repo — including ones buried in git history.

Auth & access control

Routes that should require login and don't; endpoints that trust a user ID from the client instead of checking it server-side.

Input handling

Injection risk, unvalidated form/API input, output that isn't escaped where it should be.

Error handling

Failures that fail silently instead of surfacing — swallowed exceptions, unhandled promise rejections, retries that mask real bugs.

Dependency risk

Outdated or known-vulnerable packages, abandoned libraries the AI happened to pick without you knowing.

Data & state integrity

Race conditions, missing transactions, client-supplied values (price, quantity, role) that should be verified server-side.

Deployment & config

Environment variables leaking to the client bundle, debug/verbose modes left on in production.

The entry offer

One scoped deliverable, one price, no surprise scope creep.

AI CODE AUDIT REPORT

$199 flat, one repo

Full seven-point check above, run against your actual code
Written report: every finding rated Critical / High / Medium / Low
Exact file + line for each finding, in plain English — not just "this is bad"
A prioritized fix order: what to do first, second, and what can wait
20-minute call to walk through the report and answer questions
Delivered in 3 business days

Scope: up to ~5,000 lines of application code (one repo, excluding vendor/generated files). Bigger than that? You'll hear the adjusted price before I start — never after.

Want the findings fixed, not just diagnosed? Implementation work after the audit runs $125/hr, scoped from the report — no obligation to continue.

What's not included

Scope limits, on purpose — an audit that promises everything is an audit you can't trust.

Not part of the $199 audit:

Writing new features — this is a health check, not a rebuild
Fixing the issues on the spot — the report tells you what and how; fixing is separate hourly work, so the report has no incentive to be padded
Infrastructure setup — I won't provision your hosting, CI, or cloud accounts from scratch
A formal penetration test or compliance certification (SOC2 / HIPAA / PCI) — this is a builder's audit, not an auditor's stamp
Repos over ~5,000 lines at the flat price — quoted separately, upfront

Why this audit, not just another freelancer

I run a production AI agent that handles real customer email for a small business — and "the code looks right" has never been good enough on its own to ship it.

Its regression suite runs 25 cases, each sampled 3 times against the live model, because AI output isn't deterministic run-to-run. Anything safety-critical is all-or-nothing — one bad run out of three fails the whole case, no partial credit. Static checks — a green build, a passing lint — don't count as verification on their own; the actual behavior gets checked every time.

That's the standard this audit applies to your code: read it, prove the finding, show you the line — not skim it and hand back a template.

FAQ

Will you charge more mid-audit if you find a lot wrong?

No. $199 is the full price for the scope above. If your repo is unusually large (rough guide: 5,000+ lines of app code), you'll get a quote before I start — never a surprise invoice after.

Do you fix the issues too?

The audit itself is diagnosis, not a patch — a report, not a pull request. Most people use it to fix things themselves with clearer prompts back to their AI tool, or come back for hourly implementation work afterward. Keeping those separate means the audit has no incentive to find more than what's actually there.

What do you need from me to start?

Read access to the repo (a GitHub/GitLab invite, or a zip export) and a one-line note on what's worrying you — or "just want a general check" is fine. No production credentials and no database access are needed; the audit reads code, it doesn't run against your live system.

What stacks do you cover?

Anything that came out of Cursor, Lovable, Replit, Bolt.new, v0, Claude Code, or similar — mostly JS/TS (React, Next.js, Node) and Python backends, plus their usual companions (Supabase, Firebase, Stripe, Postgres). If your stack is unusual, ask before ordering.

How do I pay?

Email hello@recommd.com with your repo link and what's worrying you — you'll get a confirmation and payment link back before any work starts.

Cursor, Lovable, Replit, Bolt or Claude built it fast.Now you need to know what it actually did.